Archive

Heavy Construction, $50 million revenue with 100 plus employees. PROBLEM Experiencing high frequency of employee injuries both severe and small. Low employee morale, 1.5 experience modifier, undesirable risk for insurance companies. SOLUTION Box lead key meetings and included safety consultants along with insurance company loss control experts...

Pipeline Contractor, Over $100 million, Over 500 employees PROBLEM Client worked with various subcontractors but did not have an affective compliance process when it came to subcontractor insurance. This caused surprises at audits as well as breach of contract on their prime contract which required them...

Manufacturer between $50 million and $100 million in revenue with over 200 employees. PROBLEM Client had multiple locations with no guidelines or policy around subcontractors and repair services (ie a contractor working on their machines or building) carrying the right insurance policies before coming on site. SOLUTION Box...

Commercial General Contractor with approximately $60 million in revenue and 50-100 employees. PROBLEM High frequency of auto claims often times involving rear end accidents. High concern around distracted driving. SOLUTION Box worked with client to setup driver meetings where Box presented statistics and illustrations...

Flooring Installation company, $10 to $30 million revenue PROBLEM Client did not carry Employment Practices Liability Insurance to protect themselves from wrongful termination and sexual harassment claims. SOLUTION Box was persistent and presented this problem over 7 consecutive years with pricing solutions each year. Box also required...

Utility Contractor Workers' Comp PROBLEM A Utility Contractor, with over 120 employees, came to Box with high losses and a Work Comp Experience Modifier (EMR) over 1.5. This resulted in insurance premiums 40% higher than the standard for their industry (additional costs of $250,000 in dollar value)....

Heavy Construction Company, $15 million revenue, 50 employees PROBLEM Company was overpaying for equipment insurance for two reasons: Their coverage only paid the actual cash value of the equipment, however, prior agent was not adjusting values down every year in collaboration with customer. Therefore they...